<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>That&#039;s Natural Team&#187; Copenhagen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tnteam.us/tag/copenhagen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tnteam.us</link>
	<description>Seeking Sustainability Outside the Box</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>A Different Side of Climate Change Legislation</title>
		<link>http://tnteam.us/side-climate-change-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://tnteam.us/side-climate-change-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate negotiations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnteam.us/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One could spend hours reading and watching and listening to the blow by blow development of climate change legislation in the U.S.  I know.  I tried.
But U.S. climate legislation is just one piece (albeit a large one) of the global picture.  Yesterday in Bonn, Germany, the current draft of the next international climate agreement lived [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could spend hours reading and watching and listening to the blow by blow development of climate change legislation in the U.S.  I know.  <a href="http://tnteam.us/category/politics/" target="_blank">I tried</a>.</p>
<p>But U.S. climate legislation is just one piece (albeit a large one) of the global picture.  Yesterday in Bonn, Germany, the current draft of the next international climate agreement <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gZ43mV4Db9iFIXXHXNeo_oS7O0bQ" target="_blank">lived to be argued over</a> another day.  It was the first step on a long road to a successful international agreement in Copenhagen this December.</p>
<p>One of the biggest challenges negotiators will face is the divide between developed and developing countries.  Emerging economies cling tightly to the concept of “common but differentiated responsibility.”  Because developed nations are responsible for the bulk of per capita emissions, they should be required to shoulder the bulk of emissions reductions.  Additionally, developing countries argue that economic development must be their priority.  It would be unfair for them to be forced to adopt emissions regulation that would slow development and make it considerably more expensive.</p>
<p>India and China have been the loudest defenders of “common but differentiated responsibility.”  Unfortunately for all of us, climate models show that even if developed nations were to adopt stringent emission reduction policies, if China and India continue at <a href="http://tnteam.us/ten-climate-change-terms/">BAU levels</a>, their growth will eclipse collective emissions reductions made by developed nations.  It makes things complicated.</p>
<p>However, it will be interesting to see how the <a href="http://www.hindu.com/2009/04/26/stories/2009042660422200.htm" target="_blank">leak of India’s national solar plan</a> will affect climate negotiations.  The sheer magnitude and ambition of this plan is not surprising to anyone familiar with India.  But it now seems tricky to argue that India should not be required to meet emissions targets – the means to do so are outlined in the plan.  Is it too much to hope for that other nations follow India’s example and develop renewable energy infrastructure on a national scale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tnteam.us/side-climate-change-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Climate Change Terms Everyone Should Know</title>
		<link>http://tnteam.us/ten-climate-change-terms/</link>
		<comments>http://tnteam.us/ten-climate-change-terms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean air act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tipping point]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tnteam.us/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In spite of the fact that climate change is taking a back burner to unemployment, the financial crisis, and the global recession (*cough* depression *cough*), there’s still an awful lot going on right now in the world of climate change policy.  Indeed, we should be looking for a House climate change bill by the end [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In spite of the fact that climate change is taking a back burner to unemployment, the financial crisis, and the global recession (*cough* depression *cough*), there’s still an awful lot going on right now in the world of climate change policy.  Indeed, we should be looking for a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/14/us/politics/14cap.html?_r=1&amp;ref=earth" target="_blank">House climate change</a> bill by the end of this week.</p>
<p>It can be easy to get lost in the sea of technical jargon accompanying any detailed discussion on climate change.  While they are just the tip of the proverbial iceberg, knowing these ten climate change terms will help you to understand what everyone is carrying on about.</p>
<p><strong>Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)</strong></p>
<p>Naturally occurring compounds in the Earth’s atmosphere that allow sunlight to enter the atmosphere.  When sunlight is reflected off the Earth’s surface, these gases trap the heat in the atmosphere.  Six GHGs – carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride – will be <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30264214/" target="_blank">classified as pollutants</a> under the Clean Air Act.</p>
<p><strong>CO2</strong></p>
<p>Of the greenhouse gases, CO2 is receiving the most press these days.  Our cars and factories breathe it out.  Plants breathe it in.  The problem is that these days, we have more cars and factories and fewer plants.  There is some debate if other GHGs will be addressed in climate change legislation.  There is no debate about CO2.</p>
<p><strong>Tipping Point</strong></p>
<p>“The levels at which the momentum for change becomes unstoppable.”  In climate change terms, the atmospheric concentration of CO2 at which some scientists argue there will be no chance of preventing negative consequences of climate change.  Some refer to it as a scenario of “irreparable change” – for example, the loss of polar ice sheets that might never be regained.  There is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/weekinreview/29revkin.html" target="_blank">still debate</a> about whether a tipping point exists and, if so, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere at which this would occur.  However, some scientists are concerned that we are approaching the tipping point more quickly than originally predicted.</p>
<p><strong>Mitigation</strong></p>
<p>The process by which human beings attempt to prevent or reduce climate change.  Emissions reductions, a shift towards renewable energy, reforestation and prevention of further deforestation, and carbon capture and sequestration all fall under the broader term of mitigation.</p>
<p><strong>Adaptation</strong></p>
<p>The process by which human beings adjust to global changes brought on by climate change.  One extreme example of adaption is can be found in the Maldives, an island nation which is preparing to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/10/magazine/10MALDIVES-t.html" target="_blank">relocate its entire population</a> in the event that the country is submerged by rising ocean waters.</p>
<p><strong>Business As Usual (BAU) </strong></p>
<p>The current emissions level and trajectory for emissions growth.  Many models have a projection for results based on BAU emissions.</p>
<p><strong>Carbon Capture &amp; Sequestration (CCS)</strong></p>
<p>Also known as carbon capture and storage, CCS is an umbrella term for the theoretical process by which CO2 is collected from the atmosphere or at the emission source, and then stuck somewhere not in the atmosphere.  While this technology is not yet deployable, it is getting <a href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/7405.htm" target="_blank">a big chunk of money.</a></p>
<p><strong>Renewables </strong></p>
<p>Add it to your spellchecker, because this new word is here to stay.  Renewables are sources of energy that are continually naturally replenished, such as wind, solar, geothermal heat, rain, and tides.  In contrast, while fossil fuels are natural, they are not naturally replenished in a reasonable time for our species.</p>
<p><strong><strong>Cap &amp; Trade</strong></strong></p>
<p>The type of climate change policy proposed by the draft House bill released in April.  A cap and trade program is based on a government-mandated ceiling of sector/industry emissions with a system of permits allowing companies a certain amount of emissions, generally measured in millions  of metric tons.  (For reference, the average carbon footprint of a U.S. resident is 20 metric tons per year.)  Companies can then buy and sell permits, which should create a market mechanism for the pricing of carbon.</p>
<p><strong>Copenhagen</strong></p>
<p>The Copenhagen Climate Conference in December 2009 is the last meeting of the members of the United Nations Framework Convention of Climate Change before the renewal of an international agreement on climate change.  At this conference, world leaders will come to an agreement to be adopted upon the expiration of the Kyoto Protocol in 2012 – <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/mar/25/copenhagen-climate-change-summit" target="_blank">or they won’t</a>.  Only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tnteam.us/ten-climate-change-terms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
